Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3400/2018 of Mrs. Duvuri Venkata Krishnamma Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 10 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3400/2018 Between: 1. MRS. DUVURI VENKATA KRISHNAMMA, W/O DUVURI SRINIVASULU
APHC010076792018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3400/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MRS. DUVURI VENKATA KRISHNAMMA, W/O DUVURI SRINIVASULU REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O H. NO. 2-41, CHINTAVANARN VILLAGE, CHILLAKURU MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to arrange to pay the compensation in accordance with the market value / rules in force for the lands surrendered by the petitioner and accepted by the respondents under Section 10 (1) of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agriculture Holdings) Act, 1973 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay immediately a sum equivalent to half of the estimated compensation payable to the petitioner as part payment of the compensation payable to the petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V PREETI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter was adjourned on 21.01.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and requested time to get instructions from his client. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 04.02.2026. On 04.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3400/2018
Dated: 11.02.2026 KAS