Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3567/2018 of Nalamalapu Krishna Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 10 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3567/2018 Between: 1. NALAMALAPU KRISHNA REDDY, SON OF VENKATESWAR REDDY, AGED
APHC010080832018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3567/2018
Between:
1. NALAMALAPU KRISHNA REDDY, SON OF VENKATESWAR
REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7-232/BR, BALAJI REVENUE COLONY, 3RD LANE, KRISHNA BHAVAN, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. NARAHARI RAMA DEVI, WIFE OF ANJI REDDY, AGED ABOUT
37 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.34-62-745, SUJATHA NAGAR, 6TH LANE, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
AMARAVATHI,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
JS,J
W.P.No.3567 of 2018
4. THE TAHSILDAR, DARSI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
ENGINEER,
ANDHRA
PRADESH
SOUTHERN
POWER
DISTRIBUTION
CORPORATION
LTD.,
ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN
POWER
DISTRIBUTION
CORPORATION
LTD.,
ONGOLE,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
7. THE
ASSISTANT
DIVISIONAL
ENGINEER
OPERATIONS,
MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
8. THE ASSISTANT ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, DARSI, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners in respect of their land situated in Sy.Nos.322/A and 322/B admeasuring Ac.0.06 cents and 0.07 cents respectively, situated at Darsi Village, Markapur Mandal, Prakasam District and consequently direct the respondents not to take up any construction activity in the above said land of the petitioners, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of their land situated in Sy.Nos.322/A and 322/B admeasuring Ac.0.06 cents and 0.07
cents respectively, situated at Darsi Village, Markapur Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018
JS,J
W.P.No.3567 of 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to correct the Writ Affidavit in paragraphs 6 and 14 and in prayer portion of Writ Petition as well as in Writ Petition Miscellaneous Petition as Sy.Nos.322/3A and 322/3B, situated at Darsi Village and Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District instead of 322/A and 322/B
respectively, and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P RAVI SHANKER
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
3. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL)
This Court made the following:
JS,J
W.P.No.3567 of 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Though sufficient time was granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the counsel for the petitioners is not showing interest to prosecute the case.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, based on the written instructions of the 4th respondent vide Rc.DT/29/2018 dated 08.02.2018 and the supporting additional material, submits that the respondents have verified through the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps site which reveals that the 1st petitioner has cancelled the Sale Deed No.3404/2017 dated 30.06.2017 in the Sub- Registrar’s Office, Darsi, through Cancellation Deed No.1778/2023 dated 13.02.2023 in the Sub-registrar’s Office, Ongole. Furthermore, the 2nd petitioner has sold away the land to one Shaik Ameen Basha who is currently in possession of the land. The learned Assistant Government Pleader further submits that the petitioners are not in physical possession of the subject land.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is devoid of merits and accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 11th February, 2026 cbs
JS,J W.P.No.3567 of 2018
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.3567 of 2018
11th February, 2026 cbs