Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8098/2018 of Puli Reddaiah, Vs Prl.Secy., Revenue dept., State of A.P., on 9 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8098/2018 Between: 1. PULI REDDAIAH,, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED 74 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION,
APHC010161832018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 8098/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PULI REDDAIAH,, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED 74 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AKKAIAHAPALEM VILLAGE, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. GORLA SHIVA NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O SAVARAPALEM VILLAGE, VTAPALEM MANDALM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ONGOLE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
4. THE TASILDAR, VETAPALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or writ more particularly in the nature of writ of
JS,J W.P.No.8098/2018
Mandamus, duly declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in trying to evict the petitioners with force without any notice or due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of Article 300(A), and principles of natural justice, and consequently direct the respondents not to evict the petitioners from Sy Nos. 378/ 1A4, Ac.00.96 cents, Sy Nos. 378/1A2, Ac.01.00 cents, Sy Nos. 378/1A2, Ac.00.70 cents, at Kothapeta Village, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District except under due process of law in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to evict the petitioners from Sy Nos. 378/1A4, Ac.00.96 cents, Sy Nos. 378/1A2, Ac.01.00 cents, Sy Nos. 378 /1A2, Ac.00.70 cents, at Kothapeta Village, Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam District except under due process of law in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.8098/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.P.Pavan Chowdary, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 10.02.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 8098/2018
Dated: 10.02.2026
RSD