Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/789/2023 of GHANTA UDAYA BHASKAR RAO Vs SHRI G SAI PRASAD, on 9 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 789/2023 Between: 1. GHANTA UDAYA BHASKAR RAO, S/O GHANTA VENKATA MADHAVA RAO, AGED 60

APHC010045202023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 789/2023

Between:

1. GHANTA

UDAYA

BHASKAR

RAO,

S/O

GHANTA

VENKATA

MADHAVA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O RAMALAYAM STREET, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT (OLD

PRAKASAM DISTRICT)

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SHRI G SAI PRASAD, THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND

ADMINISTRATION. 3RD FLOOR, APIIC TOWERS, IT PARK, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA

DISTRICT, BAPATLA.(OLD PRAKASAM DISTRICT)

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnor herein and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in WP No. 1030 of 2022 dated 01.07.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. B S SHIVAJI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard both the learned counsel.

When the matter is taken up, Ms.Sudeepthi Potluri, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date: 10.02.2026 M K K

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Contempt Case No.789 of 2023

Dated: 10.02.2026

M K K

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead