Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/788/2023 of AKULA MADHAVA RAYUDU Vs G SAI PRASAD,I.A.S on 9 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 788/2023 Between: 1. AKULA MADHAVA RAYUDU, S/O LAKSHMANA SWAMY, AGED 56 YEARS, R/O 11-148,
APHC010045182023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 788/2023
Between:
1. AKULA MADHAVA RAYUDU, S/O LAKSHMANA SWAMY, AGED 56
YEARS, R/O 11-148, RAMALAYAM BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE
AND MANDAL,BAPATLA DIST ( OLD PRAKASAM DIST )
2. BOYINA SUBBULU,, W/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 55YEARS, MASCO
BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, BAPATLA
DISTRICT , OLD PRAKASAM DIST
3. NAKKALA PUNNA RAO,, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 52 YEARS, MASCO BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU VILLAGE AND MANDAL. BAPATLA
DISTRICT., OLD PRAKASAM DIST
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD I A S, THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND
ADMINISTRATION,
3RD
FLOOR,
APIIC
TOWERS,
IT
PARK,
MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SMT VIJAYA KRISHNAN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA
DISTRICT, BAPATLA
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them under Sections 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in WP No. 1031 of 2022 dated 01.07.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. B S SHIVAJI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard both the learned counsel.
When the matter is taken up, Ms.Sudeepthi Potluri, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 10.02.2026 M K K
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Contempt Case No.788 of 2023
Dated: 10.02.2026
M K K