Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22133/2018 of Chintapalli Sreenivas Setty, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 9 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.22133 OF 2018 Between: Chintapalli Sreenivas Setty. --- Petitioner and The State of
APHC010469072018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.22133 OF 2018
Between:
Chintapalli Sreenivas Setty.
---
Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat,
Velagapudi, Amaravathi,
Thullur Mandal, Guntur District and
3 others.
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
:
Sri Rambabu Koppineedi
Counsel for the respondents
:
G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
“to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to interfere and dispossess the peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner’s land in Sy.No. 255/4 (Old Sy.No. 255/3) to an extent of Ac.5-00 cents situated at Kalipatnam Village, Mogalturu Mandal, West Godavari District without putting notice and following due process of law as illegal, high handed and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere and dispossess with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of his property and pass such other ............................”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. However, if the respondents attempt to interfere with and dispossess the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of land in Sy.No. 255/4 (Old Sy.No. 255/3), to an extent of Ac.5-00 cents, situated at Kalipatnam Village, Mogalturu Mandal, West Godavari District, the petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court for appropriate relief. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:10.02.2026 DSH