Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/721/2023 of BELLAM KRISHNA Vs MEDIDA JAHNAVI on 9 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 721/2023 Between: 1. BELLAM KRISHNA, S/O. LATE BELLAM GANGAIAH, @ MALA THOTI GANGADU, AGED
APHC010045442023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 721/2023
Between:
1. BELLAM KRISHNA, S/O. LATE BELLAM GANGAIAH, @ MALA THOTI
GANGADU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC. RETD. EMPLOYEE, R/O.
KOLLAFARM VILLAGE, H/O. DODDIPALLE AGRAHARAM POST, PILER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. MEDIDA JAHNAVI, The Sub Collector, Madanapalle, Annamaiah District.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.20810 of 2022 dated 15.07.2022 and punish them under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the name of the sole respondent herein above CC No. 721/2023 and substitute the present incumbent and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAMAMOHAN
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. T N M RANGA RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard both the learned counsel.
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 10.02.2026 M K K
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Contempt Case No.721 of 2023
Dated: 10.02.2026
M K K