Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9312/2018 of K.TIRUPATAIAH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX [3459] PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.9312 OF 2018 Between: K. Tirupatiah. --- Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh,
APHC010214422018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ::
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.9312 OF 2018
Between:
K. Tirupatiah.
---
Petitioner
and
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat
Buildings, Velagapudi,
Amaravathi, Guntur District and
2 others.
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner
:
Sri P.V.N. Kiran Kumar
Counsel for the respondents
:
G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner, seeking the following relief:
“to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action of the respondents No.3 in interfering with petitioner rights over the land in an extent of Ac.1.82 Cents in Sy.No.21/A1 of Vankayalapadu Village fields, Edlapadu Mandal, Guntur District even though the revenue entries stands on petitioner name and the same is a private patta land is highly illegal, colorable exercise of power and in utter violation of the principles of natural justice and well established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Articles, 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.3 not to interfere with the petitioner rights over the land in an extent of Ac.1.82 Cents in Sy.No.21/A1 of Vankayalapadu Village fields, Edlapadu Mandal, Guntur District belongs to the petitioner and pass such other ............................”
2. On 27.01.2026, there was no representation. Again the matter was called on 10.02.2026; even on that day, there was no representation for the petitioner.
3. However, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on written instructions, submits that the Tahsildar,
Edlapadu Mandal has resumed the land to an extent of Ac.2.31 cents in Survey No.21/A1 and allotted it to Muslims Shadi Khana and Eedga, as per the Web Land records. Further, as per the statement of the concerned Muslim community of Boyapalem, H/o. Vankayalapadu Village, the villagers were offering prayers in the said land and a Eedga was constructed in the subject land in the year 2014 itself.
4. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:10.02.2026 DSH