Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/790/2023 of NISSANKARARAO CHITTIBABU Vs VIJAYA KRISHNAN,I.A.S on 9 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 790/2023 Between: 1. NISSANKARARAO CHITTIBABU, S/O N. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O EWS

APHC010045222023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 790/2023

Between:

1. NISSANKARARAO CHITTIBABU, S/O N. PULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67

YEARS,

R/O

EWS

NO.747,

ROAD

NO.3,

KPHB

COLONY,

HYDERABAD.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. VIJAYA KRISHNAN I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA

DISTRICT, BAPATLA.

2. SMT P SAROJINI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFICER, CHIRALA

REVENUE DIVISION. CHIRALA. BAPATLA DISTRICT.

3. SRI J PRABHAKAR, TAHSILDAR, CHIRALA MANDAL, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors and punish them for their wilful and deliberate violation of the orders passed by this Hon'ble court in WP No.

18911 of 2022, dated 20.07.2022 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. P SUBASH

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard both the learned counsel.

When the matter is taken up, Ms.Sudeepthi Potluri, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date: 10.02.2026 M K K

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Contempt Case No.790 of 2023

Dated: 10.02.2026

M K K

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead