Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/34547/2018 of Syed Khader Bhasha, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 9 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34547/2018 Between: 1. SYED KHADER BHASHA,, S/O. MASTHAN SAHEB, AGE 49 YEARS, OCC.

APHC010714242018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 34547/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SYED KHADER BHASHA,, S/O. MASTHAN SAHEB, AGE 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHENNA SAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHAPALAPALLI POST, DAKKALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

2. SYED SHAFI,, S/O. MASTHAN SAHEB, AGE 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHENNA SAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHAPALAPALLI POST, DAKKALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

3. SYED BABU,, S/O. MASTHAN SAHEB, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHENNA SAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHAPALAPALLI POST, DAKKALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

4. MOGAL KALESHA,, S/O. MAHABOOB BEG, AGE 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. CHENNA SAMUDRAM VILLAGE, CHAPALAPALLI POST, DAKKALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT AT

NELLORE.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, DAKKALI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 4th respondent not filing report as directed by the 3rd respondent on 17.04.2017 in RC.B1.415/2017 for grant of pattas in favour of the petitioners in respect of lands in in Sy.Nos. 85/A to an extent Ac. 2.76 cents, Sy.No.86/1 an extent of Ac. 0.74 cents, Sy.No. 86/6 Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chennasamudram Village, Dakkili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider for grant of patta in pursuance of the letter of the 3rd respondent vide Letter in RC.B1.415/2017 dated. 17.04.2017 in respect lands in Sy.Nos. 85/A to an extent Ac. 2.76 cents, Sy.No.86/1 an extent of Ac. 0.74 cents, Sy.No. 86/6 Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chennasamudram Village, Dakkili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to consider for grant of patta in pursuance of the letter of the 3rd respondent vide Letter in RC.B1.415/2017 dated. 17.04.2017 in respect lands in Sy.Nos. 85/A to an extent Ac. 2.76 cents, Sy.No. 86/1 an extent of Ac. 0.74 cents, Sy.No. 86/6 Ac. 1.50 cents situated at Chennasamudram Village, Dakkili Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

The petitioner has earlier filed W.P.No.16964 of 2015 and this Court on 21.11.2022 disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to follow due process of law. In view of the same, the cause in this writ petition does not survive for consideration.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 10.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 34547/2018

Dated: 10.02.2026 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead