Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30720/2018 of Bogineni Malakondayya Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30720/2018 Between: 1. BOGINENI MALAKONDAYYA, S/O ROSAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
APHC010624402018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 30720/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BOGINENI MALAKONDAYYA, S/O ROSAYYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MUSINIVALASA PANCHAYAT, SIGADAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. BOGINENI MAHESH, S/O MALAKONDAYYA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESIDENT OF MUSINIVALASA PANCHAYAT, SIGADAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
3. GANGAVARAPU PADMAVATHI, W/O NARASIMHARAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BONDAPALLI VILLAGE, GARIVIDI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
4. U.GOLLABABU, S/O DALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BONDAPALLI VILLAGE, GARIVIDI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
5. GANGAVARAPU NARASIMHULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BONDAPALLI VILLAGE,
GARIVIDI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
JS, J W.P.No.30720/2018
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM.
3. THE DALEMRAJUVALASA GRAM PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, (PRD),
G.SIGADAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the impugned order in Rc.No.1063/2018 H Dt. 3-08-2018 as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to of principal natural Justice and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Rc.No. 1063/2018 H Dt. 3-08-2018 passed by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)
JS, J W.P.No.30720/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 09.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 30720/2018
Date: 09.02.2026 rsd