Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/88/2023 of KOLLURU AMARNADH Vs SRI PURETY MEHAR KUMAR on 5 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 88/2023 Between: 1. KOLLURU AMARNADH, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, OCC

APHC010007252023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 88/2023

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KOLLURU AMARNADH, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, OCC FARMER, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 10-117, MULPURU VILLAGE, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, OLD GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. A.SRIRAMA MURTHY,, S/O. LATE SAMPANGI RAO, OCC RETD. BSNL EMPLOYEE, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. MULPURU VILLAGE, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, OLD GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. GANTA LAKSHMI,, W/O. SRINIVASA RAO, OCC HOUSEWIFE, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. MULPURU VILLAGE, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT, OLD GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. SRI PURETY MEHAR KUMAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT.(OLD GUNTUR DISTRICT).

2. SRI T BABU RAO, PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MULPURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, AMRUTHALURU MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT.(OLD GUNTUR DISTRICT

...CONTEMNOR(S):

The Court made the following:

1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 05.12.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.38283 of 2022.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 05.12.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 38283 of 2022, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.

3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date :06.02.2026 klk

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

C.C. No.88 of 2023

06.02.2026 klk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead