Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22088/2018 of 63rd ward, Kailash Nagar Sansherna Seva Sangam Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22088/2018 Between: 1. 63RD WARD, KAILASH NAGAR SANSHERNA SEVA
APHC010468972018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22088/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. 63RD WARD, KAILASH NAGAR SANSHERNA SEVA SANGAM, (REGD.NO.393/2013) DOOR NO. 11-1-2/1, OPP. SIVA TEMPLE, NEAR INDIAN GAS GODOWN, KANITI ROAD, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI GVR VARMA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE (SURVEY AND SETTLEMENT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF SURVEY, SETTLEMENT AND LAND RECORDS, ANDHRA PRADESH, DOOR NO. 48-11-18-7/5, SRI SAI RESIDENCY, OPP.LANE TO A.P.A.C. COMMUNITY APARTMENT, RAMVARAPPADU, VIJAYAWADA- 520 008, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, TENNETI BHAVAN,VISAKHAPATNAM, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS,
COLLECTORATE OFFICE, MAHARANIPET, VISAKHAPATNAM, AP STATE.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents in noting down the encroachment that was occurred on either side of 130 Feet Road (Kaniti Road, Gajuwaka) as arbitrary, illegal, untenable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to depute well versed surveyor to note down encroachment of 130 Feet Road situated in Survey No.186/2 of Chinagantyada Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to depute the superior survey officials to conduct survey to note down encroachment of 130 Feet Road situated in Survey No.186/2 of Chinagantyada Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of We writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22088/2018
Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS