WP/14811/2018 of Trichy L. Srinivasan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 February 2026

1. TRICHY L. SRINIVASAN, S/O. LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAM, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC.LAND LORD, R/O. YAGAPURAM VILLAGE, MANAPARAI TALUQ, TRICHY DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE.

2. L.KOTHANDARAMAN, S/O. LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAM, AGED 77 YEARS,OCC.LAND LORD, R/O. D. NO.207-A, VIGNESH KEERTHANA APARTMENTS, TRICHY DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE.

3. L. GOPALAN, S/O. LATE LAKSHMINARASIMHAM, AGED 75 YEARS,OCC.LAND LORD,

R/O. YAGAPURAM VILLAGE, MANAPARAL TALUQ, TRICHY DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, SATYAVEEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

4. THE AP INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPOTATION, 1ST FLOOR, PARISHRAMA BHAVANAM, FATEH MAIDAN ROAD, HYDERABAD, REP.BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SRI E.

PRATAP, ZONAL MANAGER, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE HERO MOTOR CORP LIMITED, CORPORATE AND REGISTERED OFFICE AT 34, COMMUNITY CENTRE, BSANK LOK, VASANT VIHAR, NEW DELHI, REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI VIKRAM SITARAM KASABEKAR, S/O. SITARAM KASABEKAR, R/O. H.NO.701/6, PALMS, UNITECH SOUTH CITY-1, GURGAON, HAYANA STATE.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in permitting the 5th respondent making heretic efforts for construction of building for Hero Company for Hero Motor Corporation in the petitioners land in Sy.No. 1 an extent of Ac. 632.96 cents situated at Madanapalem Inam Estate, Satyaveedu Mandal, Chittoor District is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land in Sy.No. 1 an extent of Ac. 632.96 cents situated at Madanapalem Inam Estate, Satyaveedu Mandal, Chittoor District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the peaceful physical possession of the petitioners in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 632-96 cents in Sy.No.1 situated at Madanapalem Inam Estate in Satyaveedu Mandal of Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM

3. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 14811/2018

Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS