WP/2908/2018 of Y SATYANARAYANA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 5 February 2026

1. Y SATYANARAYANA, S/O.Y.APPANNA,AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,

R/O.HIG-109, BHARATNAGAR COLONY, MOOSAPET, HYDERABAD- 500080

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATON OF STAMPS, ANDHRA PRADESH AT VIJAYAWADA.

3. THE CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATON OF STAMPS, ANDHRA PRADESH, AT VIJAYAWADA

4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM

5. VULLI MURALI KRISHNA, S/O.U.VEERABADRAPANDU RANGA RAO, AGE 56 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.12-29-11-A, KOBBARITHOTA, WARD NO.29, TADEPALLIGUDEM, W.G DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 16.12.2017 in Proceedings No.G1/1295/2016 passed by the 4'1' respondent whereby informing the petitioner that unregistered sale deed could not be validated as the executants of unregistered sale deed disowned the execution of sale deed as illegal, arbitrary and consequently to set-aside the aforesaid order dated 16.12.2017 by directing the 4th respondent to collect the deficit stamp duty for validation of the sale deed dated 27.1.2005 of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to collect deficit stamp duty for validation of the sale deed dated 27.1.2005 of the petitoner by suspending the impugned order dated 16.12.2017 in ProceedingsNo.G1/1295/2016 of the 4th respondnet, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. OMR LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard Sri S. Noor Mohammed Ali Jinnah, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. During the hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum.

3. Since the issue involved in the writ petition is with regard to the signature on the unregistered sale deed, dated 27.01.2005, the petitioner is at liberty to approach before the appropriate forum to work out his remedy.

4. With this observation, the Writ Petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2908/2018

Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS