Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/112/2023 of GURRAMPATI NAGARAJU Vs GUMMARAJU SREEDHAR MURTHY on 5 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 112/2023 Between: 1. GURRAMPATI NAGARAJU, S/O LATE GURRAMPATIGANGANNA, AGED
APHC010004612023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 112/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GURRAMPATI NAGARAJU, S/O LATE GURRAMPATIGANGANNA, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O OBULADEVA NAGAR, ANANTAPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. AMBATI PRAKASH,, S/O LATE ADINARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O 1-1787, MUDIGUBBA VILLAGE, ANANTAPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
3. GURRAMPATIVEERANJINEYULU,, S/O LATE GURRAMPATI RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, 30-379, KOTHACHERUVU VILLAGE, DHARMAVARAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. GUMMARAJU SREEDHAR MURTHY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. TAHSILDAR, ANANTAPUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
2. V PRATAP REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, OCC. MANDAL SURVEYOR, ANANTAPUR MANDAL AND DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
The Court made the following:
1. This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents for non- implementation of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No. 17867 of 2022 dated 28.06.2022.
2. After issuance of the notice on respondents, the respondents have filed a counter affidavit. Along with the said counter affidavit, the respondents have placed on record an endorsement dated 17.10.2022, wherein it is stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered in compliance with the directions of this Court.
3. In view of the compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.17867 of 2022 dated 28.06.2022, no further orders are required to be passed in this Contempt Case. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date : 06.02.2026 klk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
C.C. No.112 of 2023
06.02.2026 klk