Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7849/2015 of E.Chandravathi, Vs The Station House Officer, on 5 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7849/2015 Between: 1. E.CHANDRAVATHI, W/O. LATE GHOUSE AHMED, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC:
APHC010489642015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 7849/2015
Between:
1. E.CHANDRAVATHI, W/O. LATE GHOUSE AHMED, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: TAHSILDAR, KONAKANAMITLA VILLAGE 86 MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONAKANAMITLA POLICE
STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PODILI PRAKASAM DISTRICT, -
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DARSI, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
4. THE
SUPERINTENDENT
OF
POLICE,
ONGOLE,
PRAKSAM
DISTRICT.
5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in summoning the petitioner to the 2nd respondent office contrary to section 160
Cr.P.C. for purpose of conducting investigation in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station and thereby harassing the petitioner by detaining hours together in the police office as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station by issuing notice u/s 160 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 151 respondent police station in the interest of justice
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 10358 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to summon the petitioner to the police station by issuing notice LI/ s 160 Cr.P.C. in Crime No. 10/2015 on the file of the 1st respondent police station pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION No.7849 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri D. Kumar Naik, learned counsel, representing Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this case.
2. The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 06.02.20296 PGR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
W.P.No.7849 of 2015
Date: 06.02.2026
PGR