Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13269/2018 of Sri Vasagiri Sudhakar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13269/2018 Between: 1. SRI VASAGIRI SUDHAKAR, S/O LATE NADIPI PULLAIAH, AGED 44
APHC010292172018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13269/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SRI VASAGIRI SUDHAKAR, S/O LATE NADIPI PULLAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS,H.NO.8-32, RANGARAJUPETA, KOILAKUNTLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REP. THROUGH ITS PRL.SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOILAKUNTLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. VASAGIRI SUBRAMANYAM, S/O PEDDA PULLIAH, AGE 56 YEARS, H.NO.5-36, SANTHAPETA, KOILAKUNTLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent herein. Passed orders in Proceedings R.C.E.2802/2016, dated, 18-10-2017, by cancelling Patta Pass Books of the petitioner vide Khata No.174 in respect of
Sy.No.172/2 to extent of Acre 1.92 Cents of Chintalkunta village of Koilkuntla Mandal and further directing the 4th respondent herein to take necessary further action in accordance with R.O.R. Act, declared as illegal, and vitiated during the pendency of the civil suit O.S.47 of 2016,before the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Koilkuntla, is as illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondent to set aside the orders passed in R.C.E.2802/2016, dated, 18-10-2017 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd respondent passed in R.C.E.2802/2016, dated, 18-10-2017, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. KUNCHA SUNIL GOUD
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13269/2018
Dated: 06.02.2026 KAS