Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23004/2016 of M.Vengamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 5 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION No.23004 of 2016 Between: 1. M.VENGAMMA, W/O. LATE PEDDA MALA KONDAIAH, AGE 65
APHC010137952016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
WRIT PETITION No.23004 of 2016
Between:
1. M.VENGAMMA, W/O. LATE PEDDA MALA KONDAIAH, AGE 65
YEARS,
OCC:
AGRICULTURE,
R/O.
ULAVARIPALEM
H/O.NARRAWADA VILLAGE, DUTTALUR (MANDAL), S.P.S.R.
NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, AT HYDERABAD.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLLORE DISTRICT,
3. THE TAHSILDAR, DUTHALOOR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOYA RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
WRIT PETITION No.23004 of 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
Pursuant to the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of submitting a letter dated 04.02.2026 in the Registry, to list the matter for withdrawal, this writ petition is listed today under the caption ‘For Withdrawal’.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 06.02.2026 IBL
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
WRIT PETITION No.23004 of 2016
Dt: 06.02.2026 IBL