Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/29538/2018 of G. Mahalakshimi, Vs State of AP on 4 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX 3459 PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JAGADAM SUMATHI WRIT PETITION No.29538 OF 2018 Between: G. Mahalakshmi and 3 others --- Petitioners and State of Andhra
APHC010619932018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JAGADAM SUMATHI
WRIT PETITION No.29538 OF 2018
Between:
G. Mahalakshmi and 3 others
---
Petitioners
and
State of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue (Stamps & Registration
Department), Secretariat, Velagapudi,
Amaravathi, Guntur District and
2 others
---
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners
:
Sri C.M.R. Velu
Counsel for the respondents
:
G.P. for Revenue
The Court made the following
JS, J
WP No.29538/2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners, seeking the following relief:
“to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents insisting for NOC from the Government to sell their assigned lands after 10 years of assignment as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the instructions issued by the Government and consequently to complete the registration of documents presented by the Ex-Servicemen and pass such other ............................”
2. During the course of the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is covered by the order, dated 09.02.2017, passed in W.P. No.4376 of 2017 by a learned single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh and contended that passing similar order in this Writ Petition would suffice.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondents, did not dispute for the same.
4. For the same reasons for which Writ Petition No.4376 of 2017 was disposed of by the erstwhile High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad on 09.02.2017, the instant Writ Petition is also disposed
JS, J WP No.29538/2018
of with the direction that the reasons and directions contained therein shall form part of this order. No order as to costs.
5. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the order passed in Writ Petition No.4376 of 2017 to this order.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:05.02.2026 DSH