WP/32119/2018 of Ethalapaka Deenadayal Ravi Varma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 4 February 2026

1. ETHALAPAKA DEENADAYAL RAVI VARMA, S/O LATE SYAM PRASAD PHALGUNA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO, 202, D.NO. 2-146, CHARITHA PRIDE APARTMENT, SRINAGAR COLONY, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.

3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, DWARAKA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM CUM TRIBUNAL SITUATED UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND

SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007, VISAKHAPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM.

5. SMT ETHALAPAKA SURYAPRABHA, W/O. LATE SYAMPRASAD PHALGUNA RAO. AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 48-15-23, ASHOK NAGAR, ASIL METTA, VISAKHAPATNAM 530 016.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the unilateral cancellation of Registered Gift Settlement deed document No. 955 of 2006, dated 20.04.2006 through a cancellation deed document No. 1726 of 2018,dated 12.04.2018 by the 3rd respondent herein as highly arbitrary , illegal, null and void, against the principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights apart from article 300-A of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provision of Registration Act and the rules made there under and consequently to set aside the same and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to entertain any document creating third party interest in respect of the subject property in gift settlement deed document No. 955 of 2006, dated 20.04.2006 and cancellation deed document No. 1726 of 2018, dated 12.04.2018, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to bring the Proposed respondent herein on record as Legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.5 in above W.P.No.32119 of 2018 as respondent No.6 and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

3. SHAIK JEELANI BASHA

4. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 05.02.2026 KAS

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 32119/2019

Dated: 05.02.2026 KAS