Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16454/2025 of AVVARU SREENIVASULU Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 4 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 16454/2025 Between: 1. AVVARU SREENIVASULU, S/O. AVVARU SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
APHC010329152025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 16454/2025
Between:
1. AVVARU SREENIVASULU, S/O. AVVARU SUBBARAYUDU, AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR ASSISTANT, O/O. DISTRICT
INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION OFFICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, R/O.
D.NO. 7/21D, NEAR CHITVEL, PULLAMPETA, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 516107
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, , INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, KADAPA REGION, ZONE-IV, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
4. THE DISTRICT VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE DISTRICT VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRPUATI
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. THE PRINCIPAL, YSRR GOVT. JUNIOR COLLEGE, SIMAHDRIPURAM, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction, particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the
impugned repatriation orders to the petitioner vide Rc.No. SPL/B3/2025, dated 28.06.2025, without any justified reason and without issuing any show cause notice to the petitioner or receiving any explanation or affording an opportunity of hearing and subsequent relieving orders issued by the respondent no.5 vide Rc.No.189/A/2025, dated 30.06.2025 relieving the-petitioner from Tirupati District as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and highly unjustified, in contravention of Principles of Natural Justice besides amounting to infringement of Fundamental Rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution and principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the impugned repatriation orders issued by the respondent no.3 vide Rc.No.
SPL/B3/2025, dated 28.06.2025 and subsequent relieving orders issued by the respondent no.5 vide Rc.No.189/A/2025, dated 30.06.2025 duly admitting the petitioner into service as Junior Assistant in the office of DIEO, Tirupati with all consequential proceedings and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the impugned repatriation orders issued by the respondent no.3 vide Rc.No. SPL/B3/2025, dated 28.06.2025 and subsequent relieving orders issued by the respondent no.4 vide Rc.No. 189/A/2025, dated 30.06.2025 duly admitting the petitioner into service as Junior Assistant in the office of District Intermediate Education Officer, Tirupati, the respondent no.5with all consequential proceedings pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOTA KRISHNA DEEPTHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in issuing the impugned repatriation orders to the petitioner vide Rc.No. SPL/B3/2025, dated 28.06.2025, without any justified reason and without issuing any show cause notice to the petitioner or receiving any explanation or affording an opportunity of hearing and subsequent relieving orders issued by the respondent no.5 vide Rc.No.189/A/2025, dated 30.06.2025 relieving the-petitioner from Tirupati District as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and highly unjustified, in contravention of Principles of Natural Justice besides amounting to infringement of Fundamental Rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution and principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the impugned repatriation orders issued by the respondent no.3 vide Rc.No. SPL/B3/2025, dated 28.6.2025 and subsequent relieving orders issued by the respondent no.5 vide Rc.No.189/A/2025, dated 30.06.2025 duly admitting the petitioner into service as Junior Assistant in the office of DIEO, Tirupati with all consequential proceedings and to pass such….”
2. Heard Ms. Kota Krishna Deepthi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents.
3. Initially the petitioner used to work as Junior Assistant in Pullampeta, Kadapa District. Now the said part of area (after re- organization) falls within the jurisdiction of Tirupati District. Hence the petitioner is entitled to continue in Tirupati District. The petitioner was repatriated to Kadapa District which is not the local area of the petitioner. Hence, he made a request to consider his case for his parent district i.e. Tirupati.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Without going into the merits of the case, liberty has been granted to the petitioner to make a representation with all relevant material to respondent no.2 within a period of two (02) weeks and if any such application is received, respondent no.2 may consider and pass appropriate orders for transfer of the petitioner into his parent district, within a period of two (02) months thereafter.
6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 05.02.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.16454 OF 2025 05.02.2026 RD