Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/1053/2008 of PANDRADA ARJUNUDU, VSP DIST. & 2 OTHERS Vs THE THASILDAR, VSP DIST. & 4 OTHERS on 4 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1053/2008 Writ Appeal under
APHC010602322008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT APPEAL NO: 1053/2008
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal preferred against the order passed in W.P.No.6007 of 2008 dated 24.03.2008.
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PANDRADA ARJUNUDU, VSP DIST. & 2 OTHERS, S/O. APPALA SWAMY, R/O. GADAMPALEM, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. PANDRADA SAMBA MURTHY, S/O. ARJUNUDU, R/O. GANDHINAGARAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. PENDRADA SATYANARAYANA, S/O.ARJUNUDU, R/O. GANDAMPALEM, GOLUGONDA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. THE THASILDAR VSP DIST 4 OTHERS, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. KANDEPALLI APPANNA DIED, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. K SATHIBABU, S/O. LATE APPANNA R/O. GANDHI NAGARAM,
CMR,J & GTK,J W.A.No.1053 of 2008
NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. K RAJU LAKSHMANA, S/O. LATE APPANNA R/O. GANDHI NAGARAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WAMP 1280 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to file writ appeal against the 4 and 5 and also as legal representatives of the 3rd respondent or to pass any other order. IA NO: 2 OF 2008(WAMP 2079 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to change the physical features and nature of house property in an extent of 484 Sq. Yds in Survey No. 316 of Gandhi Nagaram Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam district, pending disposal of the writ appeal or to pass any other order. Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. SARATH KUMAR D Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT
2. P RAJASEKHAR The Court made the following:
CMR,J & GTK,J W.A.No.1053 of 2008
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) As the appellants in this old appeal of the year 2008 are not turning up for hearing and as there is also no representation on behalf of the appellants, the matter is ordered to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also as usual, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. So it is evident that the appellants are not evincing any interest to pursue the appeal.
2. Therefore, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs
3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J
_______________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J
Date : 05-02-2026 BMS