Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/837/2018 of The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs G. Prakash Neelakantam on 3 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT APPEAL NO: 837/2018
APHC010430902018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT APPEAL NO: 837/2018
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal Preferred Against the Order dated 4.1.2018, passed in W.P.No.44703 of 2017
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ASSN.I) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, A.P.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
4. STATE LEVEL GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN/SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND CHIEF COMRISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH. VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
5. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
6. THE SUB-REGISTRAR, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. G PRAKASH NEELAKANTAM, S/O DAYASEELA, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.4-23-7, 1ST LINE, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. K AROGYAM, W/O G. PRAKASH NEELAKANTAM, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.4-23-7, 1ST LINE, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3. ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APCRDA, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of days in filling the writ appeal against the order dated 04.01.2018 made in IA.No. 2/2017 in WP.No. 44703/2017, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 04.01.2018 made in IA.No. 2/2017 in WP.No. 44703/2017, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR
2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
This writ appeal is filed challenging the order of the learned Single Judge passed in I.A.No.2 of 2017 in W.P.No.44703 of 2017.
2. Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2.
3. The writ petitioners have approached the Committee constituted under G.O.Ms.No.300 dated 05.07.2016 for deletion of immovable property of the petitioners from the list of Section 22-A (1) (e) of the Registration Act, 1908. The said request was refused by the Committee. Challenging the same, they have filed the writ petition and in the interlocutory application, the learned Single Judge has ordered for suspension of the said order of the Committee.
4. Aggrieved by the said interim order, the State has preferred this appeal.
5. When the appeal came up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents / writ petitioners submits that subsequently, G.O.Ms.No.258 Revenue (Assignment-IV) Department, dated 18.05.2018 was issued deleting the property of the writ petitioners from the purview of Section 22-A (1) (e) of the Registration Act, 1908 and as such, the grievance of the writ petitioners is adequately redressed.
6. The copy of the said G.O. was also furnished to the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. On instructions, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that it is a fact that the said G.O. was issued deleting the property of the writ petitioners from the purview of Section 22-A (1) (e) of the Registration Act, 1908.
7. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in this appeal for adjudication.
8. Therefore, recording the same, the Writ Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 04.02.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
WRIT APPEAL NO: 837/2018 Date: 04.02.2026
ARR