Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10688/2018 of Pula Narayana Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 3 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10688/2018 Between: 1. PULA NARAYANA, S/O LATE PEDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010244022018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10688/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PULA NARAYANA, S/O LATE PEDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE. R/O. AKUTHOTAPALLI VILLGE, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, STATE SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU DIVISION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not issuing family members certificate in favour of the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein to issue family members certificate in favour of the petitioner as per the family tree certified by the 4th respondent, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to issue family members certificate in favour of the petitioner as per the family tree certified by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to make an appropriate application before the Mee Seva.
Permission is accorded, as prayed for.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10688/2018
Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS