Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/27984/2018 of Nethala Nagaraju Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 3 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27984/2018 Between: 1. NETHALA NAGARAJU, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RIO

APHC010588152018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 27984/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. NETHALA NAGARAJU, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, RIO SARVASIDHI, S-RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, S-RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 2nd respondent in not conducting the survey and fixing the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village pursuant to F.Challan No.DERO11701003733 dated 17.5.2017 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct survey and fix the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village and pass

JS, J W.P.No.27984/2018

IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to conduct survey and fix the boundaries for the land of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.83 to an extent of Ac.1.00 cents of Sarvasiddhi Village pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS, J W.P.No.27984/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri.D.Prasad Kumar, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.02.2026 rsd

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 27984/2018

Date: 04.02.2026 rsd

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead