Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/29852/2018 of G.Subba Rao Vs State of AP on 3 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 29852/2018 Between: 1. G.SUBBA RAO, S/O G.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YRS, OCC.
APHC010625242018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 29852/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. G.SUBBA RAO, S/O G.SUBBA RAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.29-28-26, TYADALLIVARI STREET, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. V.CH.N. SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATA RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YRS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.40-5-516, VALLURI PURNACHANDRA RAO ROAD, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL. BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
JS, J W.P.No.29852/2018
pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not Surveying and fixing the boundaries for the petitioners lands as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to survey and fix the boundaries for the petitioners land admeasuring 0-50 cents in Sy.No.28/1 of Chapaluppada Village, Bhimunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim directions directing the respondents to act on the representation dated 25-07-2018 submitted by the petitioners pending disposal of the WP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. C M R VELU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.29852/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.02.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 29852/2018
Date: 04.02.2026 rsd