Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23518/2025 of ADAPAKA KASEELU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 23518/2025 Between: 1. ADAPAKA KASEELU, S/O APPALA NAIDU, AGE 36 YRS, OCC WORKING AS
APHC010458922025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 23518/2025
Between:
1. ADAPAKA KASEELU, S/O APPALA NAIDU, AGE 36 YRS, OCC
WORKING
AS
TYPIST-CUM-
COMPUTER
OPERATOR
AT
TAHSILDAR OFFICE, SANTHAKAVITI MANDAL, R/O D.NO. 1-13, MAIN ROAD, SIRIPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. SHEIK HASEENA BEGUM,, W/O GAPHOOR, AGE 40 YRS, OCC
WORKING
AS
TYPIST-CUM-
COMPUTER
OPERATOR
AT
TAHSILDAR OFFICE PALAKONDA MANDAL, R/O D.NO.341, INDIRA
NAGAR COLONY, PALAKONDA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION CCLA, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT
AT
SRIKAKULAM.
4. THE
TAHSILDAR,
SANTHAKAVITI
MANDAL,
SRIKAKULAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declaring the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings vide Rc.No.1908/2020,A2, dt 12.08.2025
terminating the petitioners from service of Data entry operators on the instigation of the direction issued by the 2nd respondent in the impugned Memo.No.REV02-28021/52/2024 (C.No.2635658) dt 02.02.2025, without following the procedure contemplated under the law as illegal, unjust, improper and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioners into service on same terms and conditions and continue them, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the 3rd respondent termination order issued in proceedings vide Rc.No.1908/2020,A2, dt: 12.08.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. AISHWARYA NAGULA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed letter dated 29.01.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 04.02.2026 M K K
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.23518 of 2025
Dated: 04.02.2026
M K K