Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30546/2018 of A. Radhika Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 3 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30546/2018 Between: 1. A . RADHIKA, D/O KONCHADA JOGARAO, AGED 36 YEARS,
APHC010637742018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 30546/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A. RADHIKA, D/O KONCHADA JOGARAO, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC,HOUSEWIFE, D.NO.1-3, SRC PURAM,(V) MAIN ROAD, KANCHILI, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.9-10-2/1/2, SIVAJIPALEM, LARSON C-BAY POST, VISAKHAPATNAM -530 017.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEBARMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, KANCHILI
290, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing impugned Rc.No.33/2017/A/ dated 14.03.2017 rejecting the case of the Petitioner for issuance of family member certificate as highly arbitrary, illegal and contrary to rules and set aside the same with a further direction to issue the family member certificate to the Petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to reconsider the representation dated 18.08.2017 made by the Petitioner for issuance of family member certificate and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M KESAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 30546/2018
Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS