Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5799/2018 of D.NARAYANASWAMY Vs The STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 3 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5799/2018 Between: 1. D.NARAYANASWAMY, OCC FARMER, R/O. 2/3, 0 C COLONY,
APHC010126932018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 5799/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. D.NARAYANASWAMY, OCC FARMER, R/O. 2/3, 0 C COLONY, RENUMAKULAPALLI VILLAGE, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-515812.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELLAGAPUDI.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONSAL OFFICER, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR
4. TAHSILDAR, URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANANTHAPUR.
5. D BOJJANNA, R/O. RENUMAKULAPAALI VILLAGE URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
6. D SAVITRAMMA, R/O. RENUMAKULAPAALI VILLAGE URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
7. D NARASIMHULU, R/O. RENUMAKULAPAALI VILLAGE URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
8. DEVINENI VENKATA RAMANAPPA, R/O. RENUMAKULAPAALI VILLAGE URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
9. D CHANDRA MOULI, R/O. RENUMAKULAPAALI VILLAGE URAVAKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus-declaring the inaction of the third respondent in not passing orders in I.A.No. /2015 in Rc. No. D2/1644/2015 pending before the third respondent as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and the rules made there under and in violation of Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the third respondent to decide the interim application expeditiously IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of pattadar passbooks and title deeds issued in the name of the fifth to ninth respondents pertaining to Ac. 10.74 in Sy.No. 238 of Undabanda village, Vidapankal Mandal, Ananthapur District, Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HAMSA DEVINENI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner through online submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 5799/2018
Dated: 04.02.2026 KAS