Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/4137/2022 of PATURI AYYAVARI REDDY Vs M.RAM MOHAN on 2 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4137/2022 Between: 1. PATURI AYYAVARI REDDY, S/O LATE CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

APHC010538492022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4137/2022

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PATURI AYYAVARI REDDY, S/O LATE CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.8/9, VUTUKURU VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. M RAM MOHAN, Special Collector (LA), Galeru Nagari Srujala Sravanthi, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District.

...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to direct notice to the respondent and punish them under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation of the order of this Honourable court passed in W.P.No.26038 of 2022, dated 18- 08-2022 by his Lordships Justice D.Ramesh under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. . Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. C VAMSI KRISHNA

The Court made the following ORDER:-

The contempt is filed for violation of interim orders dated 18.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.26038 of 2022, wherein this Court directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner and take appropriate action.

2. On last occasion, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has given up the vakalat and it seems that no subsequent vakalat has been filed till today.

3. Learned counsel for the contemnor has filed his counter stating that the respondent has considered the representation of the petitioner along with the report of the Special Deputy Collector, Somasila Project, dated 25.08.2021 and they issued preliminary notification on 09.06.2022.

4. Recording the said submission, the contempt is closed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date: 03.02.2026 Dvs

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4137/2022

Dated: 03.02.2026

Dvs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead