Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5471/2022 of SHAIK CHAN BASHA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 2 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5471/2022 Between: 1. SHAIK CHAN BASHA, S/O. LATE SHAIK BABU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010640432022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5471/2022
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SHAIK CHAN BASHA, S/O. LATE SHAIK BABU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
OCC. CULTIVATION,
R/O. ISLAM PETA, SINGARAYAKONDA (V), SINGARAYAKONDA (M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. SMT CH USHA, TAHSILDAR, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to Summon the Respondent/Contemnor for willfully violating and showing gross negligence for the order dt. 17.08.2022 in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 in W.P. No. 25883 of 2022 passed by Honoruable Justice Sri D. Ramesh and punish them as per law in the interest of justice and to pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L
The Court made the following ORDER:-
The contempt is filed for violation of the interim orders dated 17.08.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25883 of 2022, wherein this Court directed the respondents not to dispossess and interfere with the possession of the petitioner’s subject property without following due process of law.
2. After notice, the contemnors have filed their reply affidavit stating that neither the Tahsildar nor any staff of the Tahsildar office ever entertained or carried out any burial of a dead body, especially in the field of the petitioner. The said assertion was not refuted by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 03.02.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5471/2022
Dated: 03.02.2026
Dvs