Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2106/2022 of NELLI MAHA LAKSHMI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 2 February 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2106/2022 Between: 1. NELLI MAHA LAKSHMI, D/O N.CHIDAMBAR REDDY,
APHC010030722022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2106/2022
Between:
1. NELLI MAHA LAKSHMI, D/O N.CHIDAMBAR REDDY, AGED. 35
YEARS,
OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
1/678,
PAMIDI
(V)
(M),
ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
2. NELLI LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O N.CHIDAMBAR REDDY, AGED. 68
YEARS,
OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
1/678,
PAMIDI
(V)
(M),
ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
REVENUE
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
ANANTAPUR,
ANANTAPUR
DISTRICT
3. THE
REVENUE
DIVISIONAL
OFFICER/SUB
COLLECTOR,
ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
4. THE TEHSILDHAR, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
5. N SAVITHRAMMA, W/O N.LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY AGED. 71
YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO D.NO.2, KANDLAPALLI (V), PAMIDI (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
6. K CHIDAMBARAMMA, W/O K.SURYA CHANDRA, AGED. 46 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O MUKUNDAPURAM (V), GARLADINNE (M),
ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
7. G ADEMMA, W/O G.RAMIREDDY, AGED. 59 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
5-12,
KANDLAPALLI
(V),
PAMIDI
(M),
ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
8. M VENKAMMA, W/O PARVATHA REDDY, AGED. 71 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, R/O 1-230, YEDDULAPALLI (V), PAMIDI (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
9. T VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O T.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED. 72
YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O 1-55, KANDLAPALLI (V), PAMIDI
(RN), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
10. M GOVINDAMMA, W/O MALLIREDDY, AGED. 62 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, RIO 2-148, YEDDULAPALLI (V), PAMIDI (M), ANANTAPUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of Respondent no.4 in carrying out alteration in Revenue Records there by altering Extents of Petitioners' Agriculture Lands, in Revenue Records, Pahanis, 1-B extract (ROR) with respect to Petitioners' respective Agriculture Lands in Survey No.58-A each respectively admeasuring an extent of Ac 3-50 Cents and Ac 3- 46 Cents situated at Kandlapalli (v), Pamidi (M), Anantapur District there by inserting the Names of Respondents 5 to 10 in Auto Mutation Title Deeds, Pahanis, 1-B extract, without giving Petitioners an opportunity of hearing as illegal, arbitrary, against the Section 5 (3) of The Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadhar Pass Books Act 1971 and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to carry out Rectifications, thereby restoring Petitioners'
names in Revenue Records Pahanis, 1-B extract (ROR) with respect to Petitioners' Agriculture Lands in Survey No.58-A each respectively admeasuring an extent of Ac 3-50 Cents and Ac 3-46 Cents situated at Kandlapalli (v), Pamidi (M), Anantapur District and to pass direct the Respondent no.4 to carry out Rectifications, thereby restoring
Petitioners' names in Revenue Records Pahanis, 1-B extract (ROR) with respect to Petitioners' respective Agriculture Lands in Survey No.58-A each respectively admeasuring an extent of Ac 3-50 Cents and Ac 3¬46 Cents situated at Kandlapalli (v), Pamidi (M), Anantapur District and to pass grant leave to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit and pass grant leave to the Petitioners/Respondents No.6 to 10 to file counter in W.P.No.2106/2022 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. P NAGENDRA REDDY
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.2106 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA 03.02.2026 RMR/CMK
WRIT PETITION No: 2106 OF 2025
Date: 03.02.2026
RMR/CMK