Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6916/2018 of Ramisetti Venkateswarlu, Vs The Tahsildar, on 2 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6916/2018 Between: 1. RAMISETTI VENKATESWARLU,, S/O SREERAMULU AGED ABOUT 70YRS,
APHC010155872018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6916/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. RAMISETTI VENKATESWARLU,, S/O SREERAMULU AGED ABOUT 70YRS, RESIDENTS OF VATSAVAI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
2. RAMISETTI SURYANARAYANA,, S/O SREERAMULU AGED ABOUT 65YRS, RESIDENTS OF VATSAVAI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. RAMISETTI VENKATA NARAYANA,, S/O SREERAMULU AGED ABOUT 63YRS RESIDENTS OF VATSAVAI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE TAHSILDAR, VATSAVAI, VATSAVAI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT JAGGAIAHPET KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in proposing to grant house site pattas in the road side margin near Sy.No.103/1, Vatsavai village and Mandal which is situated adjacent to the existing R and B road which leads Vatsavai - Vemula Narva village as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to grant house site pattas in the road side margin of Vatsavai - Vemula Narva road near Sy.No.103/1 of Vatsavai village and Mandal, Krishna District in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to grant house site pattas in the road side margin of Vatsavai - Vemula Narva road near Sy.No.103/1 of Vatsavai village and Mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 03.02.2026 PBS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6916/2018
Dated: 03.02.2026 PBS