Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21804/2018 of Smt. Kancherla Revathi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 1 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21804/2018 Between: 1. SMT. KANCHERLA REVATHI, D/O LATE RAGHAVA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS,
APHC010464922018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 21804/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT. KANCHERLA REVATHI, D/O LATE RAGHAVA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF MAGALLU VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. SMT. KANCHARLA VENKATA NAGAMANI, W/O LATE RAGHAVA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF MAGALLU VILLAGE, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522 203.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM.
3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the petitioners' applications 03-03-2016 and 22-12-2016 for mutation of the land Ac.0.39 Cts in Sy.No.270 and Ac.0.15 Cts in Sy. No.271/1 of Magallu village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District, in the name of first petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P Record of Right in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to enter the name of the first petitioner in the Revenue records and to issue Pattadar Pass Book and Title Deed in respect of the land Ac.0.39 Cts in Sy.No.270 and Ac.0.15 Cts in Sy. No.271/1 of Magallu village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct tat: respondents to consider the applications dated 03-03-2016 and 22- 12-2016 for mutation of the land Ac.0.39 cents in Sy.No.270 and Ac.0.15 Cts in Sy.No. 271 /1 01 Magallu Village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri M.S.P. Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri D. Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 02.02.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 21804/2018
Dated: 02.02.2026 KAS