WP/23092/2007 of D.VENKAT RAMANA, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. Vs THE COMMISSIONER, AP VAIDYA VIDANA PARISHAD, HYD.& 2 on 1 February 2026

1. D.VENKAT RAMANA, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT., S/O NARAYANA, ASST.ENGINEER (TECHNICAL OFFICER) OFFICE OF THE DIST.CO.ORDINATOR OF HOSPITAL SERVICES, A.P.VAIDYA VIDHANA PARISHAD, DIST.HOSPITAL, ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE COMMISSIONER AP VAIDYA VIDANA PARISHAD HYD 2, KOTI, HYDERABAD.

2. THE DISTRICT CO ORDINATOR OF HOSPITAL SERVICES, DISTRICT HOSPITAL ONGOLE, PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.

3. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF ADMINISTRATION WING, JALASOUDHA BUILDING, ERRAMANZIL, HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to retain and continue the petitioner in the first respondent organisation in his position as Assistant Engineer, by setting aside the order of the first respondent issued in Proc.Rc.No.4808/APVVP-Cell/2006 dt.15-12-2006 declaring the same as illegal, and consequently set aside the order of the Hon'ble A.P.Administrative Tribunal passed in OA No.7596 of 2006 dt.9-10-2007 declaring the same as illegal and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the circumstance of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 30088 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the first respondent bearing Proc.No.4898/APVVP- Cell/2006 dt.15-12-2006 and consequently the orders of the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No.7596 of 2006 dt.9-10-2007 and consequently direct the first respondent to retain and continue the petitioner in the first respondent organisation as otherwise the petitioner would be put to great loss and suffering. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 35193 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated condone the delay of 47 days in representing the WPMP SR 70603 of 2012 in WP No. 23092 of 2007 IA NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP 44791 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 162 days in filing the set aside order dated: 17.10.2011 passed in WP No. 23092 of 2011 and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2012(WPMP 46474 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders dt: 17.10.2012 in WP No. 23092 of 2007 on the file of this Hon'ble Court and hear the matter on merits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K ANANTHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S A WAHEED SHABAZ

2. VADAPALLI RAMESH

3. GP FOR SERVICES I

4. K L N SWAMY

5. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 23092 of 2007 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Smt C.Radha, learned counsel representing Sri K.Anantha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.

2. The statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

4. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

_____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 02.02.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

WRIT PETITION NO: 23092 of 2007

Dated: 02.02.2026 TM