Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1141/2026 of NELAPATLA NAGARAJU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 30 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 1141/2026 Between: 1. NELAPATLA NAGARAJU, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 41 YEARS, OCC REMUNERATION BARBER,
APHC010000302026
IN THE H
(
SATURDAY,TH
TWO T
THE HONOU
WRIT
Between:
1. NELAPATLA NAGARA
REMUNERATION B
REDDYGUDEM MAN
1. THE
STATE
OF
SECRETARY, END
BUILDINGS, VELA
DISTRICT. - 522238
2. COMMISSIONER OF
PRADESH, GOLLAPU
3. SRI DURGA MALL
INDHRAKEELAD, R
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Petition under Article
circumstances stated in th
pleased to issue a writ or
nature of WRIT OF MANDA
not restoring the Petitione
Respondent temple even t
report long back and no sin
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
HE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
URABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
T PETITION NO: 1141/2026
AJU, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 41 YEA
BARBER, R/O. MUCHINAPALLE
DAL, NTR DISTRICT. - 521215
...PE
AND
AP,
REPRESENTED
BY
ITS
P
DOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECR
AGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL,
ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF
UDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. - 5
LESWARA SWAMY VARLA DEVES
I, VIJAYAWADA, REPRESENTED
R. - 520001
...RESPON
226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co r order or direction with more particula AMUS declaring the action of the Resp r's service as Remuneration Barber N
though the enquiry was completed and
ngle allegation was proved against the P
RS, OCC
VILLAGE,
TITIONER
PRINCIPLE
RETARIAT
GUNTUR
ANDHRA
520012
STHANAM
BY ITS
NDENT(S):
g that in the
urt may be
arly in the
ondents in
No.82 in 3rd
d submitted
Petitioner is
illegal, arbitrary and as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Art 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent temple to restore the Petitioner in to his service as Remuneration Barber No.82 forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent temple to consider the Representations dated 07- 06-2024 and 04-07-2025 to permit the Petitioner to discharge his duties as Remuneration Barber No. 82 forthwith with and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for ENDOWMENTS, AP REGION.
2.GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed to consider the representations made by the petitioner for the restoration of the petitioner’s service as Remuneration Barber No.82 in the 3rd respondent temple.
The petitioner, a traditional Barber working on commission basis, was unable to attend duties due to severe Covid-19 infection, kidney surgery, and back problems. Certain barbers, owing to personal grudges, lodged a false complaint against him. An enquiry was conducted, and the Enquiry Officer found that no allegation was proved against the petitioner.
Though the enquiry report exonerating the petitioner was submitted nearly two months ago, the 3rd respondent has not restored his service despite representations dated 07.06.2024 and 04.07.2025. Hence, the inaction of the respondents is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 16
and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on record, including the representations dated 07.06.2024 and 04.07.2025, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider the said representations in accordance with law and pass appropriate final orders, within four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________
JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 31.01.2026
DSV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 1141/2026
Dated: 31.01.2026
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE No: WRIT PETITION NO: 1141/2026
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.
No
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Office Note
31.01.2026 DR, J
The writ petition is disposed of. (vide separate order)
________
DR, J DSV