Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/325/2026 of KOLLU VIJAYALAKSHMI Vs KOLLU DURGA CHANDRA RAO on 30 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SATURDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 325/2026 Between: 1. KOLLU VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O KOLLU DURGA CHANDRA RAO, RESIDING AT DWARAKA TOWERS, BACK SIDE OF
APHC010006672026
IN TH
SATURDAY,
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KOLLU VIJAYALA RESIDING AT DWA TECHNOLOGY, EN
1. KOLLU DURGA CH 18A, Patamata, Vija Petition under Secti that in the circumstances be pleased to punish the 10 to 12 of the Contempt of India for willful and d passed in W.P.No.2962 Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup dispense with the filing passed in Writ Petition contempt case, and pass E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUA O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G ONTEMPT CASE NO: 325/2026 KSHMI, W/O KOLLU DURGA CH ARAKA TOWERS, BACK SIDE OF SR NIKEPADU ,VIJAYAWADA. AND HANDRA RAO, S/o Narasimha rao, ayawada, NTR District. .. ons 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts A s stated in the affidavit file herein the e respondents herein under the provis t of Court Act read with Article 215 of deliberate violation of the Orders da 3 of 2025 of this Hon'ble Court in on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma of the certified copy of the order da No.29623 of 2025, pending disposa s DESH
ARY DRANATH ROY GEDELA HANDRA RAO, RK INSTITUTE ...PETITIONER Rio D.No.67-8- .CONTEMNOR Act 1971 praying High Court may ions of Sections the Constitution ated 15-11-2024 the interest of mstances stated ay be pleased to ated 22.12.2025 al of the above
CMR,J & GTK,J C.C.No.325 of 2026
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MARADA GOVARDHAN VARMA Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. CMR,J & GTK,J C.C.No.325 of 2026
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
As per order dated 22.12.2025 passed in writ petition No.29623 of 2025, this Court has directed respondent No.5 to deliver the custody of the child to the petitioner through respondent No.4-Station House Officer of Patamata Police Station, on or before 24.12.2025 by 5.00 P.M.
2. This contempt case has been filed stating that there is a delay in giving custody of the child. It is stated that the custody of the child was given on 04.01.2026. But the fact that is established here is that the order of the Court is complied with and custody of the child has been given to the petitioner in compliance of the order of the Court. Simply because there is delay of 10 days in giving custody of the child, it cannot be said that there is any deliberate disobedience of the order of the Court, so as to haul up the respondent for contempt of Court. If the respondent offers any explanation for the delay, the same can be condoned.
3. Therefore, we do not find any valid ground to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent.
4. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 31.01.2026 MDP