WP/21834/2022 of R. Satyanarayana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 January 2026

APHC010360732022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 21834/2022

Between:

1. R. SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC.

CULTIVATION, RIO. D.NO.9-358, AAMARVATHI NAGAR, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT

OF

REVENUE

(ASSIGNMENT)

SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHITTOOR REVENUE

DIVISION, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR

DISTRICT.

5. SRI BRAHMRISHI ASHRAM A REGD TRUST, CHUTTAGUNTA

RAMAPURAM

VILLAGE,

RAYALACHERUVU

ROAD,

RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P., REP

BY ITS SECRETARY.

6. M KRISHNA S/O LATE M RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC

EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/2, LOKAKMATHA PURAM,

7. M RADHA W/O LATE M RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740, LOKAKMATHA

PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR

DISTRICT

8. M KALYANI W/O P BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC

HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740,LOKAKMATHA PURAM,

CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT

9. M SUBRAMANYAM S/O LATE M RAMAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 27

YEARS, OCC SELF EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-740, LOKAKMATHA PURAM, CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR

, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

10. M SAMPATH KUMAR S/O LATE M VELAYUDHAM, AGED ABOUT 32

YEARS,

OCC

EMPLOYEE,

RESIDING

AT

D.NO.2-74/A,

YERRAMITTA , RAJIV NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

11. M LIKITH KUMAR S/O LATE M VELAYUDHAM, AGED ABOUT 28

YEARS, OCC UN EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT D.NO.2-74/A, YERRAMITTA , RAJIV NAGAR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT

12. M PADMA W/O LATE M KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC

HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO.4-78/A, LOKAKMATHA PURAM,

13. M SWATHI W/O MANISH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC HOUSE

WIFE,

RESIDING

AT

D.NO.4-78/2,

LOKAKMATHA

PURAM,

CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

14. M DIVYA W/O DINAKAR, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC HOUSE

WIFE,

RESIDING

AT

D.NO.4-78/2,

LOKAKMATHA

PURAM,

CHUTTAGUNTA RAMAPURAM, CHITTOOR , CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

RR 5 AND 6 TO 14 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT ORDER

DT.26.06.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2022 AND

I.A.NO.02 OF 2023 RESPECTIVELY.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction mare particularly in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing notice under Form-II of A.P.Assigned lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007, dated 23-03-2022 where by trying to evict the petitioner and alienate the same to the 3rd parties from the land to an extent of Ac.03-5

I

cents

in

S.No.242/1

of

C.Ramapuram

Village,

Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District, as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and consequently set aside the same and pass pleased to grant stay of all further proceeding including dispossession of the petitioner from the lands with reference to an extent of Ac.03-51 cents in S.No.242/1 of C.Ramapuram Village, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Chittoor District., pending disposal of the writ petition and pass pleased to implead the Petitioner/Proposed Respondent No. 5 herein as Respondent No. 5 in W.P.No.21834 of 2022, and pass such other order or orders pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28-07-2022 issued in IA.No.1 of 2022 in WP.No.21834 of 2022 and to dismiss the writ petition as the same subject was filed vide WP.No.28190 of 2022 Which operates as res judicata and pass pleased to implead the Petitioners/Proposed Respondents as Respondents No. 5 to 13 in W.P. 21834 of 2022 and all it's consequential proceedings before this Hon'ble Court and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR

3. O UDAYA KUMAR

The Court made the following: