Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2305/2016 of SRI.B.VENKATESHWARA REDDY, GUNTAKAL Vs M. CHANDRASEKHAR, ANANTAPUR & 2 OTHERS on 29 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3565] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2305/2016 Between: 1.

APHC010545232016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2305/2016

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI.B.VENKATESHWARA REDDY, GUNTAKAL, S/O.B.CHENNAKESHAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, PROVISIONAL EDBPM, PEDDADODDI, BRANCH POST OFFICE, GUNTAKAL DIVISION, GUNTAKAL.

...PETITIONER AND

1. M CHANDRASEKHAR ANANTAPUR 2 OTHERS, S/O AGE NOT KNOWN, THE SUPDT. OF POST OFFICES, ANANTAPUR DIVISION, ANANTAPUR 515001., A.P.,

2. SANJEEV RANJAN, S/O AGE NOT KNOWN THE POSTMASTER GENERAL, KURNOOL REGION, KURNOOL. A.P.

3. M SAMPATH, S/O AGE NOT KNOWN THE CHIEF POSTMASTER GENERAL, A.P.CIRCLE, DAKSADAN, ABIDS, HYDERABAD.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents/contemnors to be present in the court and to punish him adequately for the contempt of court incurred by him for the disobedience of the Hon'ble High Court order dt.21-1-2003 in W.P.M.P.No.1363/2003 in W.P.No.1093/2003 willfully and deliberately and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. KRISHNA DEVAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2305 of 2016 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 21.01.2003 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.1363 of 2003 in W.P.No.1093 of 2003.

2. It appears that at the stage of admission, the Division Bench of this Court passed an interim order as extracted hereinunder:- “There shall be an interim direction to the respondents not to make any appointment to the post sought for by the petitioner, if not already made.

Notice”.

3. During the course of hearing of this Contempt Case, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that after detailed hearing, the said Writ Petition was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide order, dated 23.08.2023.

4. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner to submit the subsequent developments happened during pendency of the Writ Petition.

However, considering the fact that the main Writ Petition itself has been dismissed, in our view, no further adjudication is required in this Contempt Case.

5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed.

6. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

_____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 30.01.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2305 of 2016

Dated: 30.01.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead