Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/7969/2015 of Pulavarti Tejo Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary on 29 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7969/2015 Between: 1.PULAVARTI TEJO, UDAYABHASKAR, S/O.VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 51

APHC010147252015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 7969/2015

Between:

1.PULAVARTI

TEJO,

UDAYABHASKAR,

S/O.VENKATA

SUBBA RAO, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O.13-69, AKIVIDU

VILLAGE & MANDAL

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH

REP

BY

ITS

PRINCIPLE

SECRETARY,

HOME

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE WEST GODAVARI

DIST ELURU, -

3. THE

STATION

HOUSE

OFFICER

AKIVIDU

POLICE

STATION, AKIVIDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

4. THE

SUBREGISTRAR,

O/O.

THE

SUB

REGISTRAR

OFFICE, AKIVIDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

5. PONNAMANDA

VENKATA

NARAYANA,

S/O.

LATE

VENKATESWARIU, AGED 63 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-4/1, JAMMUVARI STREET, AKIVIDU VILLAGE & MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT.

DEV,J

W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015

6. PONNAMANDA

VENKATA

KALYAN,

S/O.

VENKATA

NARAYANA,

AGED

YEARS,

DOOR

NO.16-4/1,

JAMMUVARI STREET, AKIVIDU VILLAGE & MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT.

7. KATTA GANGA RAJU, S/O. LATE BULLI SWAMY, AGED

63 YEARS, DOOR NO.16-29, MATTAVARI STREET, AKIVUDU VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT.

8. KATTA YESUBABU, S/O. GANGA RAJU, 29 YEARS

DOOR

NO.16-29,

MATTAVARI

STREET,

AKIVUDU

VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT.

9. KATTA BULLI SWAMY, S/O. GANGA RAJU, AGED 37

YEARS,

DOOR

NO.16-29,

MATTAVARI

STREET,

AKIVUDU VILLAGE, W.G. DISTRICT.

10.ANKANI

DURGA

LAKSHMI,

W/O.VENKATESWARLU,

AGED

YEARS,

DOOR

NO.30/767-116,

VULLINGIPALEM,

MACHALIPATNAM

MANDAL,

KRISHNA DISTRICT

11.KOKKIRAGADDA

SATYAVATHI,

W/O.

NAGARAJU,

AGED 29 YEARS, H. NO.30-795-6, VULLINGIPALEM, MACHALIPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

12.TAMMU SUNITA, W/O. SURESH, AGED 24 YEARS, H.

NO.30-795-6,

VULLINGIPALEM,

MACHALIPATNAM

MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus and declare the action of the official respondents is not taking any action on the complaint of the petitioner filed on 21-02-2015 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and

DEV,J

A

of

the

Constitution

of

India,

consequently

direct

respondents to initiated appropriate (Criminal ) legal action against the res. No.4 to 12 basing on the complaint of the petitioner dtd.21-02-2015 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 10520 OF 2015

Petition

under

Section

CPC

praying

that

in

the

circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR against 4th to 12 respondents and investigate in to the matter pending disposal of the main WP No.

of 2015

and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K L N SWAMY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

The Court made the following:

DEV,J

W.P.NO.7969 OF 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Smt.Indu, learned counsel representing Mr.K.L.N Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner on record represents that this matter has become infructuous.

2. In view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND 30.01.2026 LSP

DEV,J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead