CC/1123/2010 of SMT. AMEETUNNISA BEGUM Vs K.Prabhakar Rao on 29 January 2026

1. SMT. AMEETUNNISA BEGUM, W/O LATE MOQBOOL, DOOR NO. 20/64/2, ASHIPAPA STREET, OPP: A.V.N. COLLGE OUT GATE, VISAKHAPATNAM- 1

2. MOHD. ABDUL RAHMAN, S/O ABDUL SALAM, DOOR NO 20/64/2, ASHIPAPA STREET, OPP: A.V.N. COLLEGE OUT GATE, VISAKHAPATNAM- 1

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. K PRABHAKAR RAO, S/o not known to the petitioner, Revenue Divisional Officer, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District

...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Punish the respondent-contemnors for non-implementation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 27/2/2007 in W.P No. 11934 of 2004 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(APPL 1019 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

Pleased to bring the proposed petitioners 3 to 7 herein on record as legal represe4ntatives of the deceased 2nd petitioner as petitioners 3 to 7 in the above Contempt Case IA NO: 2 OF 2011(APPL 7251 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VL N G K MURTHY Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1123 of 2010 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

This Contempt Case is filed against the respondent complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11934 of 2004, wherein the Division Bench of this Court while allowing the said writ petition holds that the market value, which has to be paid by the petitioners herein shall be Rs.1,71,064.80/- and the petitioners shall make deposit of the said amount within a period of two months from that day.

2. Heard Mujtahid Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt Kotharu Vijayeswari, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent.

3. As per the petitioners, they had deposited the said amount within the time stipulated. On perusal of the order of this Court, it is clear that there is no direction to Respondent No.1 to comply the order of this Court. It is for the petitioners to comply the order by making such deposit. In view of the same, in our considered view, there is no contempt in this case.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed.

5. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

_____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 30.01.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1123 of 2010

Dated: 30.01.2026 TM