Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/266/2026 of TURAKA MALLIKHARJUNA RAO Vs NEKKALAPUDI SRI RAM GOPAL on 29 January 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION Between: 1. TURAKA MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, S/O. GOPAIAH AGED 52 YEARS, OCC EMPOLYEE, R/O. UD/LD KONDAPALLI, IBRAHIMPATNAM
APHC010035852026
IN TH
FRIDAY,T
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
CIVIL R
Between:
1. TURAKA MALLIKH
OCC EMPOLYEE,
KONDAPALLI,
IB
(ERSTWHILE KRIS
1. NEKKALAPUDI SR
years, R/o. D.No.5
Mandal, NTR Distri
Petition under Artic
circumstances stated in
pleased topleased to allo
pre-condition deposit of
A.S.No.157 of 2025 on
Sessions Judge at Vijay
amount in the interest of j
Counsel for the Petition
1.MOHAMMAD GHAL
Counsel for the Respon
1.
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND
REVISION PETITION NO: 266/2026
ARJUNA RAO, S/O. GOPAIAH AGE
R/O. UD/LD- 423, NEW B COLONY
RAHIMPATNAM
MANDAL,
NT
SHNA DISTRICT) A.P
AND
RI RAM GOPAL, S/o. Rama Rao, A
5-133, Kazipeta, Guntupalli Village,
ct (Erstwhile Krishna District) A.P
...R
le 227 of the Constitution of India,pra
n the grounds filed herein,the High
ow the revision by modifying the Ord
decretal amount passed in I.A.No. 9
n the file of the Hon'ble II Addition
yawada, Krishna District to 20perce
justice and pass
ner:
LIB SHAHID
ndent:
DESH
Y
DRANATH ROY
ED 52 YEARS,
Y, SECTOR-3,
TR
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
Aged about 67
Ibrahimpatnam
RESPONDENT
aying that in the
Court may be
der of 50percent
941 of 2025 in
nal District and
ent of decretal
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Aggrieved by the impugned order dated 20.11.2025 passed in I.A.No.941 of 2025 in A.S.No.157 of 2025 granting stay of execution of the decree passed in O.S.No.1668 of 2021 on the file of learned V Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada on condition of depositing of 50% of the decretal amount within two months and in default, that the petition shall stand dismissed, the present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner.
3. The only grievance of the revision petitioner is relating to deposit of 50% of the decretal amount while granting stay of execution of the decree. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 50% of the decretal amount comes to Rs.3,14,217/- along with interest and the petitioner is not in a position to deposit the same as he is only an employee in a Thermal Power Station. Therefore, he only prays to modify the said order by reducing the amount to be deposited.
4. Therefore, considering the said request, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of modifying the impugned order of granting stay of execution of the decree on deposit of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in total within one month from the date of this order before the first appellate Court, failing which, the order of stay stands vacated without any further reference to this Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 30.01.2026 ARR
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 266/2026
Date: 30.01.2026
ARR