Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/2080/2020 of Kommu Baburao Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2080/2020 Between: 1. KOMMU BABURAO, S/O ESRAYELU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010036252020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2080/2020
Between:
1. KOMMU BABURAO, S/O ESRAYELU, AGED 68 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
HNO.
1-37,
AMBAPURAM
VILLAGE,
VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. NALLURI AROGYAM, W/O JAMALAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
HNO.
2-123,
AMBAPURAM
VILLAGE,
VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THODETI KIRAN, S/O LATE CHITTIBABU, AGED ABOUT 29
YEARS, OM CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 1-41, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. PAIDIMUKKALA RAMESH BABU, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED
ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 1-160, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
5. KOKKILIGADDA JEEVARATNAM, S/O ELIYA, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 2-86, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. THODETI SAMSONU, S/O VARA PRASADA RAO, AGED 71 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 2-48, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
7. CHILUVURI EBURJU, S/O SAMSONU, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, R/O AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
8. PENAMUCHA VICTORIYA, W/O LATE BABU RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 2-180, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
9. GAJAGANTI BAYAMMA, W/O NAGESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS,
OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/O
AMBAPURAM
VILLAGE,
VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
10. KOMMU RAMULU, S/O LATE JEEVARATNAM, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 1-5-1, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
11. KOMMU MARIYADASU, S/O LATE JEEVARATNAM, AGED 27
YEARS, 0CC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 1-5-1, AMBAPURAM
VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
12. KOMMU VENU BABU, S/O LATE JEEVARATNAM, AGED 21 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O HNO. 1-5-1, AMBAPURAM VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
13. TOKAIA CHINA HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O LATE ANJAIAH AGED
ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO AMBAPURAM
VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY TO GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR.
2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM.
3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
4. TAHSILDAR, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, AMBAPURAM REVENUE VILLAGE, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in erecting boards in petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac.0.25 cents each in R.S.Nos. 52, 68, 72, 78 of Ambapuram Revenue Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District and trying to dispossess them high handedly without following due process of law, as illegal, irregular, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, contrary to A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 and
rules framed thereunder, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to dispossess the Petitioners from their lands IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos: 4 and 5 not to dispossess the Petitioners from their agricultural lands admeasuring Ac. 0.25 cents each in R.S.Nos: 52, 68, 72, 78 of Ambapuram Revenue Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District, without following due process of law pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M SOLOMON RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri M.Solomon Raju, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition would not survive for adjudication and no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 30.01.2026 SSA
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO:2080 of 2020 Dated:30.01.2026
SSA