WP/21584/2018 of Avvaru Thandava Krishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 January 2026

1. AVVARU THANDAVA KRISHNA, S/O.VENKATAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 103, WHITE LOTUS APARTMENT, YMR COLONY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

2. NAGAMALLA SHANKAR, S/O. N.C. SUBBAIH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, H.NO. 24/194, VASANTHAPETA, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

3. JINKA RAJA SEKAR, S/O. CHENNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 26/95, BANGARAYYA KOTTALA, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

4. VADDHI DAMODAR DAAS, S/O. DASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. NO. 24/0604, VASANTHAPETA., P,RODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

5. NAGAMALLA VISHWA PRASAD, S/O. N.C. NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, R/O. 24/749-1, GURUVAIAHPETA, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

6. JINKA JAYA PRAKASH, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 24/590, VASANTHAPETA, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

7. SOMA CHANDRA SHEKAR, S/O. SREE RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. 4/600, MEDAMEDHA, SUPER BAZAR ROAD, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

JS, J W.P.No.21584/2018

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. SOCIETIES REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA.

2. THE DISTRICT SOCIETIES REGISTRAR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT

3. THE PADMASALI KALYANA MANDAPAM COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 5/1903, GANDHI ROAD, PRODATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not acted upon the representation dated 17.03.2018 of the petitioners to convey the General Council Meeting of the 3rd Respondent Committee is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation 17.03.2018 for conveying General Council Meeting of the 3rd Respondent Committee by invoking his inherent powers pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the representation dated 17.03.2018 made of the petitioners for conveyina General Council Meeting of the 3rd Respondent Committee by invoking his inherent powers pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)

JS, J W.P.No.21584/2018

The Court made the following ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the term of the subject body was is only for a period of 3 years and the said period is already lapsed and the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Perused the record.

Since the term of the committee has expired on 03.09.2019, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 30.01.2026 rsd

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 21584/2018

Date: 30.01.2026 rsd