Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10793/2018 of S.JAYANNA Vs STATE OF AP on 29 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10793/2018 Between: 1. S.JAYANNA, S.JAYANNA S/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
APHC010235272018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10793/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. S.JAYANNA, S.JAYANNA S/O LATE SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION- DAILY LABOUR, RIO ORVAKAL VILLAGE, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT KURNOOL
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE, LAND ACQUISITION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the impugned order in Rc. 802/2017 dated 26-8-2017 on the file of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kurnool, confirming the orders of third respondent /Tahsildar, Orvakal Mandal in Rc.A.588/2014 dated 17-10- 2014 resuming the land Ac.3.68 Cts in Sy.No. 336- B2 of Sakunala village, Orvakal Mandal, Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles
JS, J W.P.No.10793/2018
of natural justice and our rights under Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioner under Act 30 of 2013and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioner as per the Government orders in G.O.Ms. No. 259 Revenue (Assn.I) Department dated 21-06-2016, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.10793/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 30.01.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10793/2018
Date: 30.01.2026 rsd