Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16423/2018 of Thammireddy Chandrasekhar Reddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 28 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16423/2018 Between: 1. THAMMIREDDY CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O T.RADHAKRISHNA
APHC010355402018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16423/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THAMMIREDDY CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O T.RADHAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RIO MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
REVENUEDEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. SUB COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. TAHSILDAR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus a. declaring the inaction of the respondent no.3 in sending report to the respondent no.2 in pursuance to the communication of the respondent no.2 vide Roc 64/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 as arbitrary and illegal and violative of the rights guaranteed to the petitioner under articles 14, 21 and 300 A of the constitution of India and b. direct the respondent no.3 to furnish report to the respondent no.2 in compliance of the communication of
JS, J W.P.No.16423/2018
the respondent no.2 vide Roc B4/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 and c. direct the respondent no.2 to dispose of the appeal dt.25.10.2016 preferred by the petitioner by considering the report from the respondent no.3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.3 to comply with the communication of the respondent no.2 vide Roc B4/4460/2016 dt.04.11.2016 and send report to the respondent no.2 and direct the respondent no.2 to pass appropriate orders on the appeal dt.25.10.2016 preferred by the petitioner by considering the report of the respondent no.3 pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P S RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.16423/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 29.01.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 16423/2018
Date: 29.01.2026 rsd