Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11698/2018 of Muddala Bhulakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 28 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11698/2018 Between: 1. MUDDALA BHULAKSHMI, W/O.CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52
APHC010263732018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11698/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MUDDALA BHULAKSHMI, W/O.CHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.KOTHAPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ,
REVENUE (REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE SUBREGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. NALLAM TULASI, W/O.LATE CHINA VENKATA REDDY , R/O.D.NO.30-12-14/1, BESTA VEEDHI, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not refunding the excess stamp duty and registration charges of an amount of Rs.1,46,000/- collected from the petitioner in pursuance of the notice No.G1/41-1/2017, dt.31-1-2017 issued by the 2nd respondent in as wholly illegal, arbitrary and consequently directed the respondents 2 and 3 to refund the excess stamp duty and registration charges of an amount of Rs.1,46,000/- collected from the petitioner in respect of Doc.No.13160/2016, dt.26-12-2016 in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to directed the respondents 2 and 3 to refund the excess stamp duty and registration charges of an amount of Rs.1,46,000/- collected from the petitioner in respect of Doc.No.13160/2016, dt.26-12-2016 in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to the petitioner respondent No. 2 to file the counter affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the Notice No.G1/41-1/2017, dated 08.03.2017.
Permission is accorded, as prayed for.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 29.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11698/2018
Dated: 29.01.2026 KAS