Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/11461/2018 of M/ S. Dandamudi Biotech, Vs Prl.Secy., Revenue dept., State of A.P., on 27 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11461/2018 Between: 1. M/ S. DANDAMUDI BIOTECH,, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
APHC010255882018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11461/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M/ S. DANDAMUDI BIOTECH,, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN MR.DANDAMUDI AVANINDRA KUMAR, S/O. LATE PAPARAO R/O. 88, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, SECUNDERABAD-500009, TELANGANA STATE
...PETITIONER AND
1. PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P
2. THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER CUM JOINT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH AT ELURU
3. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, ELURU DIVISION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus by declaring that the inaction of the respondent in not disposing the application filed by the forest department under section 63 of A.P Estates Abolition Act 1948 bearing SR No. 4 o 2007 in respect of property admeasuring Ac. 276.37 of petitioners land in old Sy No. 2/1 new survey number 266/2a and 266/2a1 to 14 of Singagudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and direct the respondent authorities to dispose of the application bearing No. 4 of 2007 pending before the second respondent authority as early as possible and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FORESTS (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri J. Kiran Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Sita Ram Chaparla, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 11461/2018
Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS