Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5842/2018 of C. MAHESWARUDU Vs The State ofAndhra Pradesh, on 27 January 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5842/2018 Between: 1. C. MAHESWARUDU, R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI
APHC010133752018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 5842/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. C. MAHESWARUDU, R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
2. SMT. Y.JAYAMMA, W/O. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, 53 YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
3. SMT. THOKA SUBBAMMA, W/O. AMRNENNA, 6O YRS.,R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. SMT. DUDEKULA THANEMMA, W/O. PEDDA THANESHA, 63 YRS. R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
5. C.SRINIVASULU, S/O. PEDDA THIRNMAIAH, 40 YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
6. SMT. K.LALITHA, W/O. SRINIVASA REDDY, 48 YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
7. C.VENKATA MADDILETI, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, 36 YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
8. SMT. THOKA SAVITRI, W/.O. DEVAIAH,
YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL
JS,J W.P.No.5842/2018
DISTRICT
9. SMT. S.VENKATAMMA, W/O. VENGALNA,
YRS.,R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
10. SMT. K.LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O. VENKATA REDDY, 36 YRS., R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
11. T.SRINIVASULU, T.SRINIVASULU S/O. AMMENNA R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
12. SMT. K.BUCHAMMA, W /O. RERNGASWAMY, 53 YRS.,R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
13. T.MADHU, S/O. RAMAKRISHNUCII-R, 38 YRS.,R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
14. SMT. CHAKALI GURRAMMA, W/O.VENKATESWARLU, 38 YRS., ALL ARE R/O. MASIDIPURAM VILLAGE, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OFANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, MAHANANDI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTIRCT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
JS,J W.P.No.5842/2018
pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in resorting to assign/allot the petitioners, house site plots Nos. 1,22,31,30,6,29,28,32,25, 19, 15,20,33 and 11, respectively in Sy. No.245/1ot Masidpuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District to third parties, though pattas granted in favour of the petitioners by the then 4th respondent Tahsildar in RCA 76(A), dated 2.5.2012 and RCA 76/2012, dated 18.8.2012are subsisting, only by succumbing to political pressures in flagrant disregard to law, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the aforesaid plots by dispossession or otherwise, and pass such other IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the plots bearing Nos. 1, 22,31, 30, 6, 29, 28, 32, 25, lg, 75,20, 33 and L1 , r'espectively in Sy. No. 245/1 of Masidpuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District by dispossession or otherwise, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders in IA.NO. 01/2018 in W>P.NO. 5842/2017 dated. 22.02.2018 and dismiss the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.5842/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief: <…..to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents in resorting to assign/allot the petitioners, house site plots Nos. 1,22,31,30,6,29,28,32,25, 19, 15,20,33 and 11, respectively in Sy. No.245/1ot Masidpuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District to third parties, though pattas granted in favour of the petitioners by the then 4th respondent Tahsildar in RCA 76(A), dated 2.5.2012 and RCA 76/2012, dated 18.8.2012are subsisting, only by succumbing to political pressures in flagrant disregard to law, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 3OO-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the aforesaid plots by dispossession or otherwise, and pass such other…=
2. Heard both the learned counsel. During the course of hearing, learned counsel on both sides consented for dispose of the writ petition by the making interim order absolute.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in possession of the subject house under a valid patta in Sy.No.245/1 of Masidpuram Village, Mahanandi Mandal, Kurnool District. He further submits that this Court on 22.02.2018, granted interim order directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners, so long as their pattas are valid and subsisting.
JS,J W.P.No.5842/2018
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that at paragraph 6, of the counter affidavit, it is stated that the original file is misplaced, and as and when the file is traced out, the respondents will follow due procedure of law before taking steps against the petitioners.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order granted by this Court on 22.02.2018, absolute. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 5842/2018
Dated: 28.01.2026
RSD